Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research ›› 2012, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (29): 5384-5388.doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 2095-4344.2012.29. 014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Feasibility of guided bone tissue regeneration technique to conserve the alveolar ridge: Two kinds of bone substitutes

Gao Xiao-wei1, Li Ke2   

  1. 1Department of Stomatology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China;
    2Oral Hospital of Urumqi City, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2012-04-09 Revised:2012-04-20 Online:2012-07-15 Published:2012-07-15
  • About author:Gao Xiao-wei★, Master, Attending physician, Department of Stomatology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China 1026830666@ qq.com

PDF

489

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The ideal bone materials for guiding bone tissue regeneration can maximally recover hard and soft tissue morphology of tooth extraction fossa, which are conducive to the success of dental grown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of different guided bone tissue materials on extraction socket in early reconstruction.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients required the extraction of the teeth, and they were randomly divided into three groups with 20 teeth in each. The teeth were extracted and the different guided bone tissue materials were implanted. Bio-Oss and hydroxyapatite were implanted into the Bio-Oss and hydroxyapatite groups after tooth extraction, and no treatment was done in the control group.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The heights of the proximal alveolar bone and the interdental papilla as well as the width of lip to lingua were changed little in the Bio-Oss group, more in the hydroxyapatite group, and most in the control group. It can prove that Bio-oss is the best guided bone tissue material in conserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction.

CLC Number: